Passive Fire Protection to separate hazardous and non-hazardous areas by firewalls and barriers?

Asked by pasmith 5 years, 10 months ago | 1 Answers

Should Passive Fire Protection (PFP) be provided to separate hazardous and non-hazardous (i.e. safe) areas, e.g. by firewalls and barriers on the FPSO?


1 Answer

1
belmoreno 5 years, 10 months ago
Industry Contractor usually does not include firewalls or barriers to separate hazardous from non-hazardous areas. Past experience regarding Fire Risk Assessments have not required such passive fire protection. In addition, the requirement for such barriers would increase safety risk as it would limit movement within the facility and potentially restrict access to escape routes. The mechanical handling philosophy depends on the ability to freely access various areas of the FPSO. The addition of firewalls/barriers would limit or restrict access of mechanical handling equipment and would have a negative effect on mechanical handling for maintenance purposes. The requirement will have a cost impact (increase) as well as a negative affect on operability.

Related Posts


How to control corrosion at compressor stations
How to control corrosion at compressor stations

Corrosion failures at compressor stations result from carelessness mostly on the part of the users or poor choices of material …