In API 1111, the installation safety factor f1 is 3.33 for buckling check. When can a lower safety factor be used ?

Asked by BrockDeider 4 years, 3 months ago | 2 Answers

In API 1111 to calculate the buckling check unity factor, an installation safety factor f1 of 3.33 is used. But since for the pipeline parameters under consideration the unity check is more than 1, we would like to take advantage of using a lower safety factor (2.0 as mentioned in the code). Under what conditions can a lower safety factor be used ?


2 Answers

3
gagonza 4 years, 3 months ago
The issue is the control of the installation vessel position and actual response of the tensioner active control system. Some issues that are significant is that the actual tension control is upstream on the vessel with considerable frictional resistance prior to leaving a stinger (inertia of pipe, inertia and friction of rollers and tracks). The use of .15% unit strain was initially devised by Shell for their projects which entered into new depths and diameters without a corresponding increase in lay vessel capability. While buckling for most pipes will be above the 0.15% unit strain, the idea is to avoid the buckling. Reducing the factor of safety could be done but I would think that a specific non-linear FEA of the pipeline buckling and residual curvature would have to be performed along with the vessel capabilities and the environmental sea-state that can surge the vessel and change the tension. Vessel motions affect sag-bend and stinger tip strains more in shallow water than deep water. In deepwater, where thrusters are also in the tension control equation there could be a case for a reduced factor of safety…but not without a thorough analysis to meet the intent of 1111. My 2 cents.

2
pasmith 4 years, 3 months ago

Per my understanding of API-1111, it suggests to use 2.0 for both safety factors f1 and f2 where f1 is bending safety factor for installation bending plus external pressure and f2 is bending safety factor for in-place bending plus external pressure. 

Safety factor f1 can be larger than 2.0 for cases where installation bending strain could increase significantly due to off-normal conditions, or smaller then 2.0 for cases where bending strains are well defined e.g. reeling.

Related Posts


Simplification Principle of Inherently Safer Design
Simplification Principle of Inherently Safer Design

Simplification means designing to eliminate unnecessary complexity, reducing the opportunities for error and mis-operation. A simpler plant is generally safer …

Nitrogen Safety
Nitrogen Safety

This document provides recommendations and guidance for safely managing the use of nitrogen gas. The intent is to focus personnel …

Installation Workover Control System (IWOCS) for Conventional Guideline Subsea Completion Equipment
Installation Workover Control System (IWOCS) for Conventional Guideline Subsea Completion Equipment

1.0 ScopeThis specification defines the minimum requirements to cover the procurement of an electro hydraulic installation and workover control system …

Can Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA) go wrong?
Can Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA) go wrong?

Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA) is undoubtedly one of the most successful techniques for assessing risk, nevertheless it is an …