Menu

Subsea Isolation Philosophy

Published on 19 Apr 2019 by Emma Leoni


For isolation purposes, all subsea facilities, including structures, jumpers, spools, flowlines, risers and umbilicals, should be risk assessed for the following activities:

  • Subsea equipment installation (excluding well completion)
  • Hook-up and pre-commissioning of the subsea system
  • Tie-in of future development phases including infill wells with no or minimum production deferment
  • Inspection, maintenance and repair activities (excluding well workover, but may include riser changeout) with no or minimum production deferment (review Subsea Inspection, Monitoring, Maintenance and Repair Philosophy for additional information)
  • Operation and Flow Assurance requirements
  • Commissioning and decommissioning of the subsea system (review Subsea Commissioning Philosophy and Subsea Decommissioning Philosophy for more information)

As a minimum two independent, proven effective barriers between the reservoir (any material source of hydrocarbons or other harmful fluids) and the working environment should be adopted for the design of the subsea components and systems. For simultaneous production operations, a proven single barrier to the producing / injecting flowline and the working environment should be adopted with a back-up means of isolation that minimizes disruption to production.

The design of subsea equipment and proposed isolation philosophy should be in accordance with:

  • API RP 17P - Recommended Practice for Subsea Structures and Manifolds
  • DNVGL-RP-0002 - Integrity Management of Subsea Production Systems

As a minimum, each barrier must be designed such that:

  • Its integrity can be verified remotely (e.g. use of the chemical injection, shut-in tubing head pressure monitoring, tree mounted instruments) or locally (e.g isolatable ROV hot stab, ROV instrumentation)
  • It has the ability to measure pressure loss and/or pressure build up in the direction the barrier is to be proven
  • Its position / location and status can be established
  • Its effectiveness can be re-established as quickly as possible
  • It is independent of other barrier elements
  • It can operate securely in the actual environment (e.g. pressure, temperature, fluids)
  • It is capable of being locked in the safe position (if required)
  • No failure of a single barrier, whether caused by human error or equipment failure, must lead to a loss of well control

Electrical equipment must be isolated from power and communication prior to any intervention. Isolation must be via a circuit breaker and by physical disconnection of supply cables.

Where HP recoverable pressure caps are utilized, ROV hotstabs with isolations must be fitted to avoid additional penetrations into the main production bores, where practicable.



Tags: subsea isolation

Related Posts:

Constructability Suggestions for Offshore and Subsea Installations

Published on 27 Apr 2019 by Nicole Castelli
Constructability Suggestions and Recommendations for Offshore and Subsea Installations.

Subsea Protection Philosophy

Published on 10 Apr 2019 by Emma Leoni
Subsea Protection's goal is to define the external protection philosophy for subsea systems (manifolds, pipelines, cables, control systems) against drop objects.

Subsea Sparing and Tooling Philosophy

Published on 18 Apr 2018 by Emma Leoni
This document is to describe the sparing and tooling requirements for the manufacture, testing, installation, pre-commissioning, commissioning and operation of the field development, for the subsea flowlines, umbilicals, subsea control system, subsea equipment and risers.

Subsea DeCommissioning Philosophy

Published on 20 Mar 2018 by Emma Leoni
This document is to detail the requirements for decommissioning of the subsea systems, flowlines and wells.

Subsea Commissioning Philosophy

Published on 26 Feb 2018 by Emma Leoni
This document is to detail pre-commissioning, commissioning, start-up and performance testing requirements for the subsea system.